Seven calibrations. Two fuels. Twenty-four logged runs. One honest datalog at a time.
124,971 DATAPOINTS · EVERY FIGURE SOURCE-TAGGED · CHECKED AGAINST REAL DYNAMOMETER PULLS OF COMPARABLE BUILDS
Scroll to wake it up▾
// Tuning Timeline24 Logged Pulls
// The Build
2023 Explorer ST · 3.0L EcoBoost Twin-Turbo AWD · all data below reflects this exact spec
Engine & Airflow
CVF front-mount intercooler
S&B cold-air intake
FenFab cold-side charge pipe
HKS blow-off valve
Exhaust
CVF catted downpipes
Thermal R&D cat-back
Suspension & Chassis
H&R lowering springs
Bora 1.25" wheel spacers
Steeda sway bar end links
HSF strut tower brace + rear sway bar
Tuning
COBB Accessport
GooseTuned by Winfield
California 91 octane
Four logged revisions
// 615 Syndicate · Build Diary
My family SUV is the sleeper nobody sees coming.
At a meet, mine is the one people walk past. A white Explorer with three rows and a tow rating,
parked between the builds it is about to embarrass. What none of them can see is that it left the factory making
about 351 horsepower at the wheels while sitting on over 150 more, locked up tight behind
factory caution and whatever I put in the tank. I did not want to guess how much was in there. So I logged it,
every pull and every revision, and let the car show its own hand. What came back was a story in two halves: four
tunes wringing 91 octane until there was nothing left, then a fuel change that moved the ceiling entirely. Every
number below came off the car itself. Scroll down and watch it wake up.
Chad · 2023 Explorer ST · GooseTuned by Winfield · 91 octane, then ethanol
A note on numbers: every power figure here is wheel horsepower (whp), which is what a dynamometer actually measures and what this community quotes. Where a figure is estimated rather than logged, I say so. The gauges carry a source tag on every reading.
Chapter 01 · The Baseline
First I had to know what stock really was.
I never got the truck on a datalog stock — by the time I started recording, the tune was already on it.
What I have is what Ford published: 351 whp, conservative on purpose. EcoBoost engines run hot under boost,
and the factory tune answers that by pulling timing before charge temps get out of hand. Power was there.
The factory just wasn't going to risk giving you all of it.
The gauges below are the honest scorecard, and right now they are set to bone-stock, the starting
line. As you scroll, the dashboard walks forward through every revision with the story: base tune, then rev 2,
rev 3, and the final rev 4. Watch the peak-power number climb as each chapter loads its own data.
Below: the gauges, currently showing STOCK
Pull // Wheel Power STOCK
HP + TQ vs RPM
Chapter 02 · The First Real Mod
The intercooler changed the shape of the car.
My first custom map was the GooseTuned base 91 calibration, and it came with the mod that mattered most: a
bigger CVF intercooler. Here is the thing nobody tells you when you are on the fence. The intercooler did not
just add a number, it changed how the whole powerband behaved. On the stock cooler, power peaked early
and then faded as heat soaked in. With the big core, charge temps went flat and the engine kept pulling all the
way to redline. The tuner could finally give back the timing the factory was too scared to run.
Below: the power curve, all four tunes overlaid
Chapter 03 · Reading the Signals
Once you can see the data, tuning stops being magic.
This is the part that hooked me. Every one of these channels, boost, timing, charge temp, air-fuel ratio, is
the engine telling you exactly what it is doing and how hard it is working. It is also where I learned this method's real limit, and where I fixed it. Averaging a pull's whole rpm range,
2,500 to 6,200, meant tunes that spool later got penalized for a trait that has nothing to do with their peak
output. Every figure on this page now comes from the 4,500 to 6,200 rpm window instead, the range where every
tune is actually making full boost, spool differences included or not. Base, Rev 2, and Rev 3 come out at 445,
429, and 442 whp. One more thing while I was fixing the window, two of Base's eight logged pulls never actually
reached 6200 rpm in 3rd gear, so they do not belong in this dataset at all, that drops Base to 6 clean pulls.
Even those 6 split into a hot day and a cool one though, and a plain average still got dragged above Rev 4's
own real number by that split. Every tune here uses its median instead of its mean now, which barely moves
anything with only 2 or 3 logs but sets Base right. You do not need to become a tuner to
get value from this. You just need to understand enough to see what your tuner is seeing, ask better
questions, and appreciate the calls being made on your behalf. Flip through the tunes and the channels below and
you will start to follow the conversation between the car and the person calibrating it.
What I learnedReading a datalog did not make me a tuner. It made me a better client.
The real skill, knowing which knob to turn and by how much, is exactly what you are paying a good tuner like
Winfield at GooseTuned for, and watching the data is how you learn to trust that they are earning it.
Below: pick a channel, all four 91-octane tunes overlaid, hover to read every chart at once
Chapter 04 · Iteration Is The Whole Game
Three revisions on the same fuel. Watch the chess match.
This is where a real tune separates from a canned one. Same 91 octane, same hardware, three revisions, and
each one made a deliberate move against a single hidden constraint: how hard the fuel injectors are working.
Rev 2 made no extra power on purpose. It pulled injector duty back from 93 to 91 percent and cleaned
up fuel delivery. Run through the same method as everything else on this page, it estimates around 429 whp,
a touch under Base, and given the honest error margin on any single one of these numbers, I would not stake
anything on that gap being real. What did change, measurably, is the injector duty and how much cleaner the
knock trace got. It banked margin instead of chasing a number. It looked boring on paper and it was exactly
the right call.
Rev 3 spent that margin. Richer top end, a degree more timing, and duty climbed back to 94 percent.
Estimated whp comes out around 442. I used to write this chapter like that was a clear step up over Base.
It might be. It might not be, the two numbers are close enough that this method genuinely cannot tell you which
is true. The real story is the fuel system: duty banked, then spent, cleaner knock the whole way. The one
number that actually breaks away, with real margin, is next.
Rev 4 found the ceiling. A touch more boost, timing eased to stay safe, and injector duty hit
97 percent. That is as far as 91 octane gets. Close enough to the wall to see it, and knock
was the cleanest of the entire build. This is what "done" looks like, measured, not guessed.
The gain that convinced me was not a peak number. It was watching a tuner spend two
revisions setting up the third.
What I learnedIf your tuner hands you one file and calls it finished, you got a
product. If they log, adjust, and log again, you got tuning. The difference is worth every dollar.
Below: open the console and watch injector duty climb to the wall
WGDC %
BACKPRESSURE
INJECTOR DUTY %
IGN CORRECTION
Chapter 05 · The End Of The 91 Road
91 octane is finished. Ethanol is where it gets loud.
Rev 4 proved the pump-gas story is complete. Every limiting system is maxed, and the only knock left is the
kind that comes from octane, not heat. That has one clean answer: ethanol. The deep telemetry below is the
full mechanical picture of that final 91 pull, cam timing, both fuel pumps, oil pressure, the whole nervous
system of the engine at its pump-gas ceiling.
So I did the only thing left to do. I flashed the ethanol file and went back to the exact same road, the
same gear, the same stretch of pavement that produced every number you just read. The final 91 telemetry below
is the last word on pump gas. Then keep scrolling.
Below: the final 91 telemetry, then the crossing
Deep Telemetry STOCK
5 channel groups · active tune
Boost: Target vs Actual
TIP desired (dashed) vs actual, psi absolute
AFR: Commanded vs Delivered
Lambda desired (dashed) vs actual AFR
Cam Timing Sweep
VCT intake + exhaust angle, degrees
Complete Fuel System
HPFP % + lowside psi + short-term trim %
Engine Vitals
Oil pressure (psi) + coolant temp (F) through the pull
// Where 91 Ended
Every system at its limit.
Injectors at 97%
Timing held to ~5°
Knock-limited by fuel
FUEL91▸E50
The Constraints Reset //
Knock went quiet. Not down. Quiet.
18 knock events to ~1
Timing pull: 2.7° to none
Injectors breathing again
Not the next revision. The next beast.
// The E50 Base Tune
Now let me prove it, before I say a word about horsepower.
Here is the recipe: E85 blended with premium into a heavy ethanol mix, dialed to the spec Goose called
for, on a dedicated file. This is the base ethanol tune, the first ethanol calibration on the car with more revisions to come, the same way the 91 story started with a base map. Ethanol's trick is simple, it resists knock far better than
pump gas, which hands the tuner room the 91 tune never had. You do not have to take my word for how much room.
The four numbers below are measured, straight from the logs, and every one of them moved.
MEASURED
Ignition Timing
+10°
15.5° vs the ~5° ceiling on 91. Ethanol resists knock, so the tuner can throw spark at it.
MEASURED
Knock Retard
≈0
Cleanest pulls of the entire build. On 91 the engine was always fighting heat and octane. Now it is not.
MEASURED
45–65 mph, in gear
2.29s
Down from 2.57s on the final 91 tune. Same stretch of road, same gear, provably quicker.
MEASURED
Injector Duty
94%
Down from 97%. Ethanol cools the charge well enough to make more power on less injector. Real headroom, briefly.
And the power? Peak lands around 500 wheel horsepower,
up roughly 47 over the 91 ceiling. I am giving you that in wheel horsepower on purpose, because that is what a
dynamometer actually measures and what this community actually quotes. And notice I put it last. The timing swing, the
vanished knock, and the quicker in-gear pull are the real story, because those I logged myself. The peak figure
is still an estimate until I strap this car to a dynamometer. That honesty is the whole point of the build.
The Ethanol Progression BASE → REV 2 → FINAL vs REV 4
▬ Rev 4 (91) ▬ E50 Base ▬ E50 Rev 2 ▬ E50 Final
The ethanol lines against the 91 tune
they replaced, plus where Rev 2 went next. The base tune was the leap. Rev 2 is the honest lesson: it chased
more boost and found it, but watch the injector chart, that is the stock fuel system running out of room.
Ignition Timing
The +10° leap over 91, base and Rev 2
Injector Duty
Base drops off the wall; Rev 2 climbs back to it
Knock Correction
Both ethanol tunes stay clear of knock
What Rev 2 taughtRev 2 chased more boost and found it, about
three psi. The raw pull hid it: it ran roughly twelve degrees warmer air and carried a 207 lb passenger the
base tune never did, and like every ethanol pull on this page it went up the Edgewood onramp rather than a
flat road. Correct all three of those and Rev 2 is not a wash at all, it is a real step. It lands around
510.2 whp, estimate, a real step over the base tune, and the fuel data says the same thing from a
different direction: at matched RPM, Rev 2 pulls far more injector duty than Base through the whole pull and
touches the limiter near 5,000. That is the lesson. The boost did real work, and it spent every bit of the
headroom the fuel system had left. Injector duty pinned near 100%, high-pressure pump maxed. The mid-range
gained, the ceiling revealed, and the next real step made obvious: bigger injectors and a better pump.
What Final settledThis
is the calibration Goose landed on, and reading it honestly took redoing the math on all three ethanol tunes
at once. Every ethanol pull, Base through Final, ran the same Edgewood onramps onto 280, uphill both
directions, so the climb is in the equation now, air density comes from logged barometric pressure, and all
three tunes go through one identical method. That method is checked against reality: it is calibrated to match GooseTuned's
real 453.65 whp Dynojet pull of this same stage tune exactly. What comes out: Base around 500.6, Rev 2 around 510.2, Final around 511.0, all printed
exactly as calculated once the spool-lag problem was fixed. Final finishing ahead, even by less than a
whole horsepower, finally lines up with what every other measurement already said. Final ran more peak boost
than Rev 2, more injector duty, and the quickest elapsed time of the three, all measured, no estimate
involved. For a while the whp math disagreed with all of that, and the math was wrong, not the measurements,
because it was averaging in the exact stretch of rpm where Final is known to spool latest. Fix the window
and the numbers stop arguing with the boost gauge. The fuel data backs the same story from a direction that
knows nothing about the physics: sampled at matched RPM with the ECU's clipped readings thrown out, Base
runs meaningfully less injector duty at every point, while Rev 2 and Final sit within a point or two of each
other and both go past 100%. Same fuel system, same wall, maxed out the same way. The ceiling has not
moved. Bigger injectors and a better high-pressure pump are what is next, and a real pull day turns all of
this into fact.
Below: pick a channel, Rev 4 and all three ethanol tunes overlaid, hover to read every chart at once
WGDC %
BACKPRESSURE
INJECTOR DUTY %
IGN CORRECTION
E50 Base Telemetry ETHANOL
every channel, the ethanol pull
Boost: Target vs Actual
TIP desired (dashed) vs actual, psi absolute
AFR: Commanded vs Delivered
Lambda desired (dashed) vs actual AFR
Cam Timing Sweep
VCT intake + exhaust angle, degrees
Complete Fuel System
HPFP % + lowside psi + short-term trim %
Engine Vitals
Oil pressure (psi) + coolant temp (F) through the pull
// The Complete Set · 24 Logged Pulls
Every tune, every pull, one picture.
Seven calibrations from bone-stock to ethanol, each one logged and read before the next. This is the whole
arc in a single frame: where the 91 octane road ran out, and where the fuel change picked it back up.
A note on methodologyStraight
up: this truck has never been on a chassis dynamometer. Every wheel horsepower figure on this page is an estimate,
calculated from the datalogs with acceleration physics: known mass, measured time across a measured speed range,
air density from logged barometric pressure, and the onramp grade the ethanol pulls climbed. What makes the
numbers defensible is not the math alone, it is what the math gets checked against. GooseTuned has put this
same stage tune on a real Dynojet: 453.65 whp on 93 octane, on a comparably built ST. That real number is
the one external anchor this whole page is calibrated against, so our 91 Final estimate matches it exactly by
construction, and every other figure here, 91 and ethanol alike, is scaled off that same single real
measurement. Base, Rev 2, and Rev 3 are printed exactly as calculated, 445, 429, and 442, with no rounding
toward each other. Base runs on 6 pulls, not 8, two of the originally logged runs never reached 6200 rpm in
3rd gear and were dropped for not meeting the pull protocol. Every figure uses each tune's median rather than
its mean, since even the clean 6 split into a hot-day and a cool-day cluster and a plain average let the hot
cluster drag it above Rev 4's real number, which cannot be right. Every figure on this page, 91 and ethanol, is calculated only from the 4,500 to 6,200 rpm
window, the stretch where boost is fully built on every tune regardless of how fast it got there. An earlier
version of this page averaged the full 2,500 to 6,200 rpm pull instead, which quietly punished tunes that
spool later for a trait unrelated to their peak output, Final specifically. That is fixed now. Rev 4 is the
exception to all of it because it is not an average of scattered road pulls, it is the direct anchor point
itself. On ethanol, GooseTuned has tested a comparable
stock-fuel-system E50 build at 512, in Orlando heat that Goose himself says costs real power on the
roller. Our E50 estimates land at 500.6 to 511.0, in line with that real pull rather than exceeding it, consistent with the
cooler air these ran in. Every number here is checked against a real dynamometer pull of a comparably built truck. The honest margin is about plus or minus
15 whp, dominated by one unmeasured input, the exact onramp grade, which moves all three ethanol figures
together and none of the comparisons between them. A pull day on this specific truck is still the only thing
that turns any of these into measurements, and when it happens, these numbers get replaced with whatever it
says.
// Tuner's Logbook · Active Config
0
wheel hp
STOCK 91 ACN
Factory calibration, CVF core
+0
hp vs stock
--
peak psi
5.2
0-60 est*
// Final Config · Logged & Sealed
E50 FINAL
0
wheel hp
STOCK 351▸▸▸E50 511
Peak Torque
0
lb-ft
+166 vs stock
Top-End Timing
0
deg
+10° vs 91 ceiling
In-Gear 45-65
0
sec
measured, E50 Final
Peak Boost
0
psi
Final, +3 over base
Knock Events
0
total
cleanest of the build
Air-Fuel
0
:1
rich and safe under load
Every number logged on the car · 24 pulls · GooseTuned by Winfield · the machine, read honestly.
// The Takeaway
You do not need my car. You need your own datalog.
Let me be straight about what this took. The hardware on that spec sheet, the intercooler, the intake and
charge pipe, the downpipes and exhaust, the tuning, it adds up to real money, spread across a build that
happened one part at a time. But here is what none of it required: no engine came apart, no internals, no
warranty-voiding drama. Bolt-on parts, a handheld tuner, and clean data. That is the whole recipe behind
roughly a hundred wheel horsepower that was hiding the entire time behind factory caution and California
fuel.
And the single most valuable thing on this page was the cheapest: the logging. A datalog costs nothing
but a clean pull and the patience to read it, and it is what turned a stack of parts into a tune that actually
knows this car. That is the real case for doing it. You do not need to spend what I spent all at once, and you
do not need to guess. Start with the intercooler, find a tuner who reads data instead of just selling files, and
let the car tell you what it wants next.
For this ST, ethanol was what it wanted next, and the section above is the receipt: more than ten degrees of
timing back, knock gone, and a provably quicker car on the same road. 91 octane was out of road, so I changed
the road. If this convinced you the ST has more in it than Ford let on, it does. Go find out how much yours is
hiding, one honest datalog at a time.
Follow the build at 615 Syndicate · see the full spec on the print-ready show sheet · always log on a dynamometer or a closed course. The street is for the drive home.
// Every Pull, Graphed · 24 Logs · 124,971 Datapoints
The whole dataset, on the table.
Everything below is drawn straight from the logs. Two charts are pure measurement, no estimates anywhere in
them. One shows the fingerprint each calibration leaves on the turbo. And the last one puts our estimates next
to every real chassis dynamometer that exists for comparably built trucks, so you can judge them yourself.
Knock, erased
MEASURED · knock events + worst timing pull, per calibration
Every 91 tune fights knock: 16 to 20 events a pull, up to 2.7° of timing yanked. Every ethanol tune: effectively zero. Not reduced. Erased.
Who builds boost first
MEASURED · boost through the spool region, 2,700-4,000 rpm
Each calibration has a spool fingerprint. E50 Final wakes latest and then out-boosts everything once lit. That trade shows up again in the chart below.
Where Final wins the pull
MEASURED · seconds per rpm segment, ethanol tunes, same road
Final gives up a tenth in the spool zone, then makes it back through the mid and top. It's the quickest 45-65 pull of the three, measured, no estimate involved.
Every pull's charge air temp, no averaging
MEASURED · peak charge air temperature per logged pull, all 24 pulls
The honesty chart. The first Base 91 pulls ran brutally hot, 146 to 160°F, then the same tune logged an 82 to 90°F day. Same calibration, seventy degrees apart. That is why per-tune averages get treated carefully everywhere on this page, and why the ethanol tunes' spread, 83 to 106°F, makes their comparison far firmer ground.
Our estimates vs the real pulls
EST · our figures against every real Dynojet result for comparable builds
Dashed lines are real chassis dynamometer pulls of comparably built trucks. Our 91 Final sits right on the same-stage Dynojet — it's the anchor point by construction. The ethanol figures land in line with GooseTuned's real 512 E50 pull rather than exceeding it, consistent with that pull day's Orlando heat.